Editor’s Note: Upon taking office, President Barack Obama faced not only the legacy disasters of the Bush-43 years but a congressional and media structure that made any major progressive initiatives politically impossible (despite formal Democratic majorities).

So, Obama sought to steady the nation’s foundering financial ship rather than overhaul it. Despite some success in steering the economy off the rocks, he managed to alienate his core supporters and still confronted hostility from the business and media hierarchies, a dilemma that Danny Schechter addresses in this guest essay:

The President’s own advisor, former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker says the financial system is “broken.” High unemployment is not dropping and home foreclosures are up.

The Obamacrats are being blamed for the economic downturn and the economy has become ‘the issue’ of the November midterm elections.

The signs of an economic recovery are hard to see, and tensions with China, a leading trade partner, may be on the cusp of a trade war.

Add to this the trillions poured into two wars we are not winning, and you have the elements of a perfect storm that some fear could lead to a depression or even a systemic collapse.

With the President’s popularity slipping and his opposition surging (at least in the media if not in the streets), the Democrats are expected to lose many seats, if not, control of the Congress.

Some in his party have been reduced to arguing, “we may not be great, but we are better than the other guys.” There is an anti-incumbent mood in both parties and the rhetoric (but not yet the reality) of revolution is motivating parts of the electorate on both sides. 

In the White House, the President has become more of a manager than a militant: initially trying to please all sides with appeals to bipartisanship, and later with programs to placate the military and Wall Street. 

Wall Street helped fund Obama’s 2008 victory. He seems to have believed that policies that would support and even enrich the private sector would lead to more job creation and cooperation.

That didn’t happen - and now more and more billionaires are funding the Republicans with no pretense to promoting equality or help for the middle class. The greed that drives these wealthy elite seems to know no bounds.
One by one, his chosen policy wonks have deserted the White House like those proverbial rats leaving a sinking ship.

First to go was wonder-kid Budget Director Peter Orszag; then, Christina Romer who headed his Council of Economic Advisors; followed by Larry Summers - the chief Economic Advisor and former Harvard president who was forced out of Harvard for remarks hostile to women.

Finally, Obama’s Chief of Staff, former Rep. Rahm Emanuel, has said sayonara to return to Chicago for a mayoral run.

Left in place - but hardly left - is Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, Obama’s Ambassador to Wall Street and point-man with China. Geithner and his former boss, Ben Bernanke, who heads the Federal Reserve Bank, see themselves as servants of stability wedded to big banks and the strategy of the soon to be departed.

They have no progressive pretensions. Little has changed for them.

The only claim this crew could make about achievement is that they averted something worse from happening. They may be correct, but proving a negative is difficult and doesn’t play well with voters who are not well versed in the reasons for the financial crisis.

For the unemployed and the under-employed, a “jobless recovery” is no recovery at all.

To placate his base and the unions, Obama has appointed another Harvard Professor in Elizabeth Warren. Her role will be to assist in shaping the new Consumer Protection Bureau she herself proposed, the only financial reform that enjoys any popularity.

Warren is outspoken and supported by progressives, yet it is not clear if she will end up with any power to run what she had hoped would be an independent agency. It ended up being tucked away as a bureau in the Federal Reserve Bank.

As a result, some analysts fear Warren is being co-opted and politically neutered.

On the left, filmmaker Michael Moore speaks for many disenchanted Obama supporters who feel betrayed by his predictable turn to the safety of the mushy middle.

“Sadly, it's a situation the Democrats have brought upon themselves - even though the majority of them didn't create the mess we're in.” he writes.
“But they've had over a year and a half to start getting the job done to fix it. Instead, they've run scared ever since they took power. To many, the shellacking they're about to receive is one they deserve.

“But if you're of a mindset that believes a return to 2001-2008 would be sheer insanity, then you probably agree we've got no choice but to save the Democrats from themselves.”

His populist progressive proposals include indicting Wall Street criminals - a proposal I put forward in my film Plunder - and imposing a moratorium on home foreclosures, something President Franklin Roosevelt did as a part of The New Deal in the 1930s. (Some big banks have suspended foreclosures when it was revealed they were breaking the law in at least 23 states.)

Moore’s views were not even present at a Washington demonstration backed by the unions in early October. Yet they are a long way from being implemented for at least four reasons.

First, they would represent a U-Turn for an administration that is nervous about appearing too anti-business and often postures left to move right. Obama’s financial and health care reform - the administrations two big “accomplishments”- reinforced corporate power more than transforming it.

Jailing Wall Street is difficult because years ago big business lobbyists assured that deregulation - and its kissing cousin, decriminalization - would make prosecuting financial crime far more difficult.

And then there’s the Congress under the sway of business interests with so-called “Blue Dog” Democratic conservatives, not to mention the anti-populist Republicans, able to filibuster and stop the kinds of changes Moore hopes for.
Oddly enough it was the banks that froze foreclosures in 23 states when fraudulent practices were unmasked,

As Naked Capitalism noted, “We’ve discussed the fact … that banks have become so powerful in Florida that they have managed to get what amount to kangaroo foreclosure courts created. Not surprisingly, the assembly line imitation of justice railroads borrowers, and prevents legitimate grievances from being heard.

“It turns out that banks in that state are so confident of their above the law status that they’ve also taken to casually changing the locks on and entering homes they don’t own, meaning haven’t foreclosed upon. This has become sufficiently common that the local press has taken notice.”

Importantly, the Supreme Court remains under the sway of free market fundamentalists who genuflect to corporate needs in almost every decision.
So a stalemate stays in place with election rhetoric concealing the conventional wisdom and status quo orientation that make deeper reform unlikely.

We seem to be in the era of one step forward and two back where the idea of change serves as an election slogan - not a commitment to more fundamental repairs.

The political system is as broken as the economic one, and there is no Superman on the horizon to fly in and fix it.

Danny Schechter, made the film Plunder The Crime of Our Time about the financial crisis as a crime story (Plunderthecrimeofourtime.com) and blogs for Mediachannel.org. Comments to dissector@mediachannel.org This article was commissioned by Al Jazeera. The views expressed are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial policy.

To comment at Consortiumblog, click here. (To make a blog comment about this or other stories, you can use your normal e-mail address and password. Ignore the prompt for a Google account.) To comment to us by e-mail, click here. To donate so we can continue reporting and publishing stories like the one you just read, click here.

Back to Home Page