The Painful History of US-Iran Distrust
Editor’s Note: The WikiLeaks’ release of thousands of classified U.S. diplomatic cables reveals the U.S. government and its allies discussing strategies for punishing and possibly attacking Iran.
However, as Danny Schechter notes after a recent visit to the former U.S. Embassy in Tehran, Washington’s plans don’t always work out as smoothly as some officials anticipate:
The building was smaller than I remembered. The fading images in my mind were grainy: angry crowds, students marching, flags burning, chants of “Death to America,” and Americans diplomats in blindfolds.
The crisis became a soap opera. Ted Koppel started his rise in TV News with ABC’s nightly “America Held Hostage” series, the forerunner to “Nightline.”
Back then, I was in radio news, just transitioning into TV. I remember publicly debating about what we should do with a DJ friend who had turned from a Vietnam War peacenik into a bomb-Iran hawk.
In Iran, the takeover of the U.S. Embassy – what students called its “conquering” – was justified as a blow against imperialism, the seizure of a “spy nest.”
It was, at the time, the most globally covered aspect of the Iranian Revolution, an audacious confrontation between people power and a foreign power.
The events that followed may have been considered revolutionary in Iran, but for progressive Americans they became the nail in President Jimmy Carter’s political coffin.
He angered Iranians first when he toasted the Shah calling him a beloved figure. He then tried and failed to negotiate through third parties and later sent in a military “rescue” operation that crashed and burned leading to his own downfall.
The Iranians held him responsible for sheltering the ailing Shah. He, in turn, was being pressured by the likes of David Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger to shelter the fleeing Monarch.
These events also helped bring on the turn to the right with the elevation of the actor we called “Ronnie Raygun.” The hostages were released in a tacit agreement after 444 days in the very hour of his inauguration.
We are still living with the consequences, as wages declined, unions were broken, and military spending escalated. Reagan invaded Grenada and Beirut where the killings of hundreds of U.S. soldiers sparked what we now label a “war on terror” and which Iranians see as a “clash of civilizations.”
The despotic Shah, our faithful servant for so many years, was driven from power by a popular revolt with the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini soon becoming the man whom Americans loved to hate.
Now, thirty-plus years later, I am standing in front of what was once our Embassy surrounded today by well-kept lawns as it was then.
It is as if the past is never past, with so many ghosts still around.
The tragedy is that polarization between the two countries remains symbolized by what is now a very politicized museum with photos of the activists who crawled through a basement window and tunnel to take it over.
They were demanding the return of the Shah to stand trial. They were protesting U.S. interference in their internal affairs.
I didn’t remember that eight hostages – women and black employees – were released by Khomeini as a gesture. He urged the black men to return home and carry on the work of America’s most famous Muslim martyr, Malcolm X. Malcolm was one of the Americans whom the Iranians admired.
There are rooms of creative if didactic art works, graffiti, and murals denouncing U.S. policy, including the American news media which the Iranians see as a weapons system that has been deployed against them. (One slogan on the wall: “Information R.I.P.”)
Perhaps this is why my film “WMD: Weapons of Mass Deception” was shown here and is popular.
The angry art is not the building’s most popular attraction. On the second floor, is the ex-Embassy’s own West Wing, behind a metal safe-like door is where the spying was done.
The offices are pretty much as the militant students found it — a soundproof glass encased safe room within a room, cryptographic equipment, communications gear that allowed the U.S. officials to tap Tehran’s telephones and a forgery bench where they invented passports and spread disinformation.
(I once saw a similar room in a former Stasi secret police station in East Germany that kept tabs on everyone.)
The students found a secret document with a floor plan of the Ayatollah’s residence and other artifacts of CIA espionage including guns and coding machines. (After the Embassy seizure, the U.S. government downplayed spying by its diplomats as “routine.”)
Today, this sort of spying is done digitally and with much more sophistication. Just last week, the U.S. government launched a massive new spy satellite to upgrade its global surveillance capabilities.
You don’t need Embassies anymore to do this dirty work (although the newly released WikiLeaks documents show that U.S. diplomats have been assigned to collect data, like frequent-flyer numbers, regarding officials in host countries).
Since those old days of 1979, the United States has set up a well-funded Office of Global Reconnaissance, but it doesn’t seem be to making Americans any more secure.
These days, a small group like WikiLeaks has found ways to release hundreds of thousands of documents that officialdom wants to hide.
Back then, as the students muscled their way into the U.S. Embassy, officials were busy destroying documents, burning them in the basement, throwing them into chemical vats that turned paper into powder, and feeding them into huge industrial-strength shredders. I saw the machines.
The Embassy’s security force managed to keep the activists at bay for three hours before surrendering, to give time for the destruction of potentially embarrassing data.
What they didn’t count on was that scores of students would spend weeks patiently and systematically piecing the shreds together, literally ironing and weaving the fragments into readable prose.
The students reconstructed the destroyed documents and published them in scores of books that topped the best-seller list in Iran, if there was one.
The late Bill Worthy, a legendary African-American journalist, brought some of the books back to Boston in 1980 only to have them confiscated at the airport where he was threatened with prosecution.
Most Americans know little of Iran’s 2,500-year history, its proud culture or the role played by the CIA in toppling the democratically elected Mossadegh government in l953 that wanted to nationalize the country’s oil instead of being forced to allow the West to exploit it.
The Ayatollah Khomeini referenced this event when he told Americans: “You have no right to complain, because you took our whole country hostage in 1953.” (There is no evidence that the Ayatollah organized the Embassy takeover, though he later defended it.)
Americans also don’t know that the United States orchestrated Iraq’s invasion of Iran in 1980 causing a half million deaths, many from chemical weapons. I met some of the still sick victims of those chemicals including a disfigured Member of Parliament who had been a war correspondent.
Saddam Hussein’s chemical attacks on Iran’s military got almost no press attention compared to his gassing of Kurds.
U.S. ignorance still feeds dangerous calls for war like those made recently by the pin-headed Lindsey Graham, a Republican senator from South Carolina. Graham has called for the sinking of the Iranian Navy.
Graham seems to have forgotten his own state’s role in launching the American civil war with an attack on Fort Sumter in Charleston harbor. The Confederates started it, but the Union finished it, finishing them finally at a great cost. Today, the South and its belligerent attitudes have risen again.
Graham also seems unaware that if we attack Iran, its forces will likely respond by blocking the Strait of Hormuz, freezing oil shipments worldwide. Not a good thing.
Today, some U.S. media and political personalities want their own Christian theocratic state comparable to the Islamic one in Iran. America’s fundamentalists – many believing in the End Times – were politicized into Christian right movements, the antecedents of today’s Tea Party, and are fired up by vicious Islamaphobia.
Theocratic evangelists posing as TV commentators like Glenn Beck urge Americans to let God Rule, the message that echoes the speeches of some Iranian Mullahs.
President George W. Bush denounced Iran as part of the “axis of evil,” another parallel to how Iranian Islamists describe the United States. There is a poster in the former U.S. Embassy building denouncing American evils.
My Iranian hosts expected me to be excited by my visit to the Embassy, an embarrassing symbol of a setback to U.S. global plans. I wasn’t.
I reminded them that when the Taliban in Afghanistan took Iranian diplomats hostage and threatened to kill them, Iran moved troops to the border and was about to invade Afghanistan before the United States did.
The U.S. government learned from the Embassy takeover in 1979, not to change imperial policies but to invest in more security. It now builds vast and far more fortified “diplomatic” enclaves like Iraq’s Green Zone. Secrecy has become the religion of the national security state.
These symbols of past conflicts have a way of blocking new initiatives and possible reconciliation. I am sure that the former Embassy building is on some target list for potential missile attacks on Tehran. Americans relish “payback” as much as Iranians.
Avoiding an escalation of tension will not be easy as Jaswant Singh, a former Indian finance minister, foreign minister and defense minister, explains:
“In both countries, deep and mutually paralyzing suspicion has poisoned relations for three decades. Negotiations in such an atmosphere are almost fated to failure.”
Can anything be done?
On the plane back, I watched the movie “SALT” in which Angelina Jolie stops a fictionalized nuclear attack on Tehran at the last second in a gun battle staged in the bunker below the White House.
Hollywood pictures the story as a plot by Russian renegades who want to use nukes to outrage the whole Muslim world and trigger a more apocalyptic jihad against the United States.
At the same time, the U.S. government is doing all it can to block Iranian nuclear ambitions. (I told an audience in Iran about my own objections to nuclear power plans in favor of green energies — not a popular position.)
There are legitimate non-fiction fears of a new war against Iran, another no-win conflict that will cause more death and sap more treasure.
The neo-cons are busy at work lobbying for just such a war, eager to replicate their “heroic victory” over Iraq. They are playing the fear card with lots of covert lobbying from Israel, which claims Iran represents an “existential” threat.
To me, the arrogant right-wing politicians and propagandists in Israel are a far more dangerous threat to any prospects for peace. Successive U.S. administrations, including the current one, shovel billions of dollars at them while appeasing their contempt and occupation of Palestinians.
The world mocks dogmatic believers in the Koran while fanatical Torah worshippers have a free pass to practice hatred.
Talk about hypocrisy.
War is a profitable business for U.S. military contractors, though not so much for American taxpayers and the broader economy. Still, as the U.S. economy continues its decline, Americans can anticipate more calls to “bomb, bomb Iran” as a means of spending our way to “recovery.”
Talk about insanity.
Already our sanctions are hurting the Iranian people and their businesses without seriously impacting their government, whatever the fiery public claims of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
The United States and Iran need to engage, but the talks that President Obama promised have yet to happen, at least not in a forthright and meaningful way. Washington seems as frozen as Tehran in making any real overtures for peace and understanding.
What if Iran turned the former U.S. Embassy into an international peace and religious center for diplomatic discourse and mediation? That might be a gesture Washington could respond to. Why not recycle a relic of the past to enable a serious initiative for resolving conflict?
Instead, the growing confrontation gives both countries an enemy to mobilize against while diverting attention from real problems. Someone has to break the ice before the two countries end up causing each other more pain!
My walk down a lane of bad memories convinced me that we need to work for a better future, not stay mired in the images and rhetorical combats of the past.
News Dissector Danny Schechter just returned from Tehran where he was invited as a judge in an international short film festival. Comments to Dissector@mediachannel.org
To comment at Consortiumblog, click here. (To make a blog comment about this or other stories, you can use your normal e-mail address and password. Ignore the prompt for a Google account.) To comment to us by e-mail, click here. To donate so we can continue reporting and publishing stories like the one you just read, click here.
Back to Home Page