Follow the Money
An intimidating array of individuals and forces wanted President
Carter ousted from the White House in 1980. Some were driven by
ambition; others by money; and still others by revenge.
Together, they were over-powering.
Newly revealed documents, meant to stay hidden from the public,
now show the interlocking relationships that operated behind the
facade of American democracy: a chilling chapter of the October
By Robert Parry
WASHINGTON -- It was the start of winter, December 21, 1992, but
the mild Washington weather was still like fall. In a secure
conference room, a senior CIA Middle East specialist sat down to
give a classified deposition to a special House task force
investigating the October Surprise controversy.
The task force had already drafted its report, which firmly
rejected allegations that the Reagan-Bush campaign sabotaged
President Carter's Iran hostage talks in 1980. The
distinguished gray-haired CIA man, Charles G. Cogan, had been
called to tie down a loose end or two.
But Cogan started his testimony with a startling recollection.
He remembered an off-hand remark that he had heard in 1981,
during a meeting between then-CIA director William J. Casey and
a prominent Republican, Joseph V. Reed. Cogan said he was
finishing a meeting with Casey in the director's seventh floor
office at CIA's campus-like headquarters in Langley, Va., when
Knowing Reed, a longtime top aide to Chase Manhattan's David
Rockefeller, Cogan lingered at the door. Cogan said he had a
"definite memory" of a comment Reed made about disrupting
President Carter's "October Surprise" of a pre-election release
of 52 American hostage held in Iran. But Cogan said he could
not recall the precise verb that Reed had used.
"Joseph Reed said, 'we' and then the verb [and then] something
about Carter's October Surprise," Cogan testified. "The
implication was we did something about Carter's October
Surprise, but I don't have the exact wording." (Another
congressional investigator, who discussed the recollection with
Cogan in a less formal setting, concluded that the verb
apparently was the past tense of an expletive related to sex.)
Though supposedly seeking evidence of just such a Republican
action, the task force lawyers did not welcome Cogan's
testimony. Republican lawyer (and former CIA official) David
Laufman asked if Cogan had since "had occasion to ask him [Reed]
Yes, Cogan replied, he had asked Reed about it, after Reed moved
to a protocol job at the United Nations. "I called him up,"
Cogan said. "He was at his farm in Connecticut, as I recall,
and I just told him that, look, this is what sticks in my mind
and what I am going to say [to Congress], and he didn't have any
comment on it and continued on to other matters."
"He didn't offer any explanation to you of what he meant?"
"No," answered Cogan.
"Nor did he deny that he had said it?" asked another task force
lawyer Mark L. Shaffer.
"He didn't say anything," Cogan responded. "We just continued
on talking about other things."
And so did the task force lawyers at this remarkable deposition.
They even failed to ask Cogan the obvious follow-up: How did
Casey react to Reed's remark about doing something to President
Carter's October Surprise? Instead, Cogan's testimony, like so
many other pieces of incriminating evidence, would be excluded
from the final report and locked away with classified
information that was intended to stay outside the public's reach.
A Hostile Witness
But the Cogan deposition was one of the "secret" documents left
behind, apparently by accident. It was mixed in with
unclassified material that I was allowed to examine in an
obscure Capitol Hill storage room. (See "October
Surprise X-Files" series for more details.)
I also discovered the notes of an FBI agent who tried to
interview Joseph Reed about his October Surprise knowledge. The
FBI man, Harry A. Penich, had scribbled down that "numerous
telephone calls were placed to him [Reed]. He failed to answer
any of them. I conservatively place the number over 10."
Finally, Penich, armed with a subpoena, cornered Reed arriving
home at his 50-acre estate in Greenwich, Conn. "He was
surprised and absolutely livid at being served at home," Penich
wrote. "His responses could best be characterized as lashing
Reed threatened to go over Penich's head. In hand-written
"talking points" that Penich apparently used to brief an unnamed
superior, the FBI agent wrote: "He [Reed] did it in such a way
as to lead a reasonable person to believe he had influence
w/you. The man's remarks were both inappropriate and improper."
But the hard-ball tactics worked. When Reed finally consented
to an interview, task force lawyers treated him with kid-gloves.
Penich took the interview notes and wrote that Reed "recalls no
contact with Casey in 1980," though Reed added that "their paths
crossed many times because of Reed's position at Chase." In
1979, Reed had spearheaded the Rockefeller lobbying to get the
shah admitted into the United States for cancer treatment, an
event that led to the seizure of the U.S. Embassy in Teheran.
As for the 1981 CIA visit, Reed added that as the newly
appointed U.S. ambassador to Morocco, he "would have stopped in
to see Casey and pay respect." But on whether Reed made any
remark about obstructing President Carter's October Surprise,
Reed claimed he "does not specifically know what October
Surprise refers to," Penich scribbled down. The task force
lawyers did not press too hard.
Most glaringly, the lawyers failed to confront Reed with a key
piece of evidence that would have impeached his contention that
he had "no contact with Casey in 1980." According to sign-in
sheets at the Reagan-Bush campaign headquarters in Arlington,
Va., which the task force had obtained, Reed saw Casey on
September 11, 1980.
On that visit, Reed accompanied David Rockefeller; Owen Frisbie,
Rockefeller's Washington lobbyist; and the late Archibald
Roosevelt, a Chase adviser and a legendary CIA veteran of Middle
East operations, including the 1953 plot that restored the shah
to the Peacock Throne.
In the quarter century after that CIA operation, David
Rockefeller's bank profited handsomely from the shah's deposits.
But when the shah was ousted in January 1979, Chase faced
serious exposure as the new Islamic government ordered $6
billion pulled from Chase's vaults.
Besides the money, Rockefeller and his aides were furious at
President Carter's treatment of the shah. Former Secretary of
State Henry Kissinger lamented that the shah had been turned
into a real-life "Flying Dutchman," fleeing from one temporary
shelter to another, from Egypt to Morocco to Mexico to the
United States to Panama, before returning to Egypt where the
shah died on July 27, 1980.
But Cogan's testimony about the Reed-Casey conversation also
pointed the way toward a major investigative avenue that the
task force had little desire to go down. The shah's family (the
Pahlavis) had close financial ties not just to Rockefeller
and Chase Manhattan but to William Casey's personal business
According to a 1984 CIA memo given to the task force, Casey
recruited his old World War II spy chum John Shaheen and Iranian
banker Cyrus Hashemi in 1979 to sell off property in New York
City belonging to the shah's Pahlavi Foundation. At that time,
radical Islamic government in Teheran was claiming that property
as its own and the shah's family was desperate for the cash.
The early Casey-Shaheen-Hashemi partnership on this Iranian
business deal was important, because in 1980 Hashemi became one
of President Carter's principal intermediaries on the hostage
crisis and Casey was in charge of Ronald Reagan's campaign. The
Casey-Shaheen-Hashemi connection made the October Surprise
allegations far more credible.
Though Cyrus Hashemi died in 1986, his older brother, Jamshid,
testified under oath before the task force that Cyrus had
arranged July 1980 meetings in Madrid where Casey discussed the
hostages with a radical Iranian mullah, Mehdi Karrubi.
Jamshid's testimony was at the heart of the October Surprise
charges that Casey derailed President Carter's hostage talks.
But the House task force cast aside the CIA memo and concluded
that there was "no evidence" that Casey had met Cyrus Hashemi
before the 1980 election in November. In the public report, the
task force briefly mentioned the CIA memo, but deleted the
identity of the foundation. The word "Pahlavi" was excised,
thus obscuring the significance of the information.
A Marcos Bagman
Also missing from the report was evidence that Cyrus
Hashemi had worked with Casey ally Shaheen on other lucrative
business schemes tied to the Pahlavi fortune. For instance, FBI
wiretaps of Cyrus Hashemi's New York City office in fall 1980
discovered that Shaheen and Hashemi were planning to invest
millions of dollars to establish a bank together, possibly in
Hong Kong with Philippine investors. (See Consortiumnews.com's "Bill
The bank deal took final shape two days after President Reagan
Inauguration and the near-simultaneous release of the 52
American hostages whom President Carter had failed to free. On
January 22, 1981, Shaheen opened the Hong Kong Deposit and
Guaranty Bank with $20 million that had been funneled to him
through a Rockefeller-connected lawyer in Geneva, named Jean
The bank sported on its board other powerful world players,
including Herminio Disini, known as Philippine President
Ferdinand Marcos's personal bag man. Indeed, a Shaheen lawyer
told me that Shaheen flew to Manila in early 1981 to meet
face-to-face with Marcos, the man whom Shaheen considered really
"in charge." The lawyer said the Hong Kong bank was a way for
Marcos "to get his hands on some of the Arabs'
In 1980, Marcos also may have delivered secret payments to
Casey. According to a letter revealed in the Philippines after
Marcos's overthrow in 1986, President Reagan wanted files about
those payments back before Marcos fled to Hawaii. The letter,
purportedly written by Marcos's executive assistant, Victor
Nituda, stated that Sen. Paul Laxalt, R-Nev., "expects all
documents checklisted during his last visit or the deal is off."
One of the files was marked "1980 SEC-014, Funds to Casey."
Another file was slugged "1980 SEC-015, Reagan Funds Not Used."
While in exile in Hawaii, Marcos reportedly boasted to visitors
that he gave $4 million to Ronald Reagan's 1980 campaign,
contributions that would have violated federal election
laws -- and might explain why Marcos was allowed to profit
off the Hong Kong bank.
From 1981-84, Hong Kong Deposit and Guaranty did pull in
hundreds of millions of petrodollars, just as Marcos had hoped.
The bank also attracted high-flying Arabs to its board of
directors. Two directors were Ghanim Al-Mazrouie, the Abu Dhabi
official who controlled 10 percent of the corrupt Bank of Credit
and Commerce International, and Hassan Yassin, a cousin of Saudi
financier Adnan Khashoggi and an adviser to BCCI principal Kamal
Adham, the former chief of Saudi intelligence.
Though Cyrus Hashemi's name was not directly connected to the
Hong Kong bank, he did receive cash from BCCI. An FBI wiretap
of Hashemi's office in early February 1981 picked up an advisory
that "money from BCCI [is] to come in tomorrow from London on
The Missing Millions
In 1984, the Hong Kong Deposit and Guaranty collapsed and an
estimated $100 million disappeared. The crash put Shaheen in
hot water again, but he died of liver cancer in 1985 so the
bank's loss was buried with him, in his estate. The biggest
loser in the deal -- the mystery $20 million investor from
1980-81 -- apparently did not want any publicity.
The House task force figured out who the bank's benefactor was.
But, again, the House report left out this intriguing fact.
The $20 million that had capitalized Hong Kong Deposit and
Guaranty, the money that was funneled through the Rockefeller
lawyer in Geneva, had come from Princess Ashraf, the shah's
strong-willed twin sister. The House task force interviewed
Ashraf and accepted her bald statement that the $20 million was
just a routine business investment.
In 1980, however, the deposed princess was one of Jimmy Carter's
most implacable enemies. She blamed the President for failing
to save the shah. His overthrow then led to the murder of her
son. Ashraf suspected, too, that President Carter's team was
desperate enough to trade the ailing shah for the hostages.
According to The Shah's Last Ride by William Shawcross, she
snubbed White House chief of staff Hamilton Jordan when their
paths crossed in Panama in early 1980.
That Princess Ashraf was supplying $20 million to Cyrus
Hashemi's American business partner, John Shaheen, while Hashemi
was supposedly helping President Carter resolve the hostage
impasse would normally be seen as evidence of a pay-off. So,
too, might BCCI's curious Concorde money flight.
But as it turned out, the task force's chief counsel, E.
Lawrence Barcella Jr., had worked as a lead attorney for BCCI in
the late 1980s. BCCI paid Barcella and his firm more than $2
million, and the lead partner in the firm was former Sen. Paul
Laxalt. Not the BCCI money, nor Ashraf's $20 million, nor the
Philippine files were mentioned in the House report. The task
force, it seemed, had no interest in following the money.
Surprise X-Files" Index
Return to Main Archive
Return to Consortium